Well, I'll start this off by stating
that I actually finished this one a few days ago, and am currently
ploughing through Andrew Rawnsley's 'The End of the Party', an
excellent account of the second and third terms of the last Labour
Government. I've got about a hundred pages to go – it is an
extremely long book, more than eight hundred pages – and I'll be
sure to put out a review when I'm done. Also some celebrating as I
pass the half-way point; the last few days have been rather all over
the place, slowing my progress a bit, but after the weekend I hope to
return to the writing pace I was making earlier in the month. Still,
half a novel in ten days ain't bad!
Back to the book at hand, though.
Ostensibly, this book discusses HMS Invincible, and to a lesser
extent her sister ships, which from the mid-1980s until today have
been the only aircraft carriers in the Royal Navy. There is plenty of
information about the ships and their deployments...but the context
is not from an engineering standpoint, but rather from a political
one – which, I should clarify, is exactly what I expected and
wanted when I bought the book in the first place. I always intended
it primarily as research for the 'Alamo' series.
Essentially, the one common assessment
– for right or wrong – that has suggested the strength of a navy
since the Second World War has been the presence of aircraft
carriers. During the war, especially in the Pacific, the aircraft
carrier was the iconic heart of the fleet; the battleships that had
been expected to serve in that function found themselves of only
limited use, technology having moved rapidly ahead of them – more
rapidly than the steel for their construction could be cut.
The United States – despite some
surprising early questions – was always destined to end up with a
substantial carrier force, and throughout the Cold War maintained a
significant fleet. It fell in numbers somewhat, but the individual
carriers increased in size and complexity as the decades went on.
Their fleet set a numerical standard for others to match, but by the
1960s, most of the nations that had adopted carrier aviation were
beginning to drop out, either officially or on a practical basis. The
Soviet Union never really treated it seriously; their carriers were
designed for very specific functions related more to fleet protection
than to power projection, the primary role for carriers in the
Western world at that time.
Basically – when the time came for
the British Government to build new carriers to replace the worn-out
ones that had been constructed during World War II, they balked at
the price, and instead moved to adopt a strategy of using 'island
bases' around the world to project power and to protect the Royal
Navy at sea. (The problems inherent in such a strategy would be
obvious in the Falklands, where it took a titanic effort to simply
drop a few bombs on a runway at Port Stanley.) The edict came down –
no new aircraft carriers to be constructed.
This was not the end, however, and
instead – as this book ably shows – the Royal Navy essentially
had to sneak aircraft carrier capability through the back door. The
concept of the 'through-deck cruiser' was created, a vessel that was
designed to operate helicopters...but which with some inexpensive
modifications could also operate VTOL aircraft. Which the British
just happened to be the best in the world at making. (You can tell
when a non-American plane is really good; the Americans buy it! That
doesn't happen if there is any realistic alternative...but it
happened for the Harrier.)
So the three 'Invincibles' were born,
though they went through numerous funding and political crises – to
the point that Invincible herself was offered to Australia as a
replacement for its carrier, going out of service – just prior to
the Falklands. That war prevented the sale of HMS Invincible, of
course, and saw that the Royal Navy would have a brief resurgence in
funding to keep it going past the tender mercies of John
Nott...though now it faces a similar problem. (Well chronicled,
though of course with the story not yet completed, in the same
author's work 'Britain's Future Navy'.)
This book presents the political
arguments well; there is an obvious bias in favour of the Navy in
these pages, but the author doesn't tend to let it get in they way –
well, not too much, anyway. The spectre of the feast of the full-size
carrier that was cancelled prior to the design of Invincible is
present throughout most of the book, and though the author has an
obvious regard for the ships, there is a general 'what if...' wistful
air on occasion. Very much well worth a read, though, and certainly
recommended.
No comments:
Post a Comment